RichM Amps I’m glad to hear the snooker won’t be interrupted again, that was annoying. So feels like capitalism winning has been worthwhile.
bosstrabs Maybe if the Unions associated with these industries hadn’t absolutely taken the piss in the 70s, there wouldn’t have been electoral support for Thatcher’s programme of privatisation. Have you thought about that?
Hursty Amps I’m genuinely interested, your the one spouting off about “us lot” killing children and burning forests So the solution is to tax the rich, how do we define the rich?
Amps Hursty how do we define the rich? Lollers, no idea, it’s ‘too difficult’, clearly beyond the capabilities of man.
alistair Amps you’re all talk. The closest you get to a protest let alone direct action is posting tedious shite on a clubbing site
Homegrove alistair I’ve become too nihilist to think anything will ever change, because people devoid of empathy will always rise on top. So the best we can do is try and make right wing folk feel bad about their voting choices.
Amps alistair The closest you get to a protest let alone direct action is posting tedious shite on a clubbing site Incorrect.
alistair Homegrove The system doesn’t allow for anything radical either on the right or left. Scaring the bond markets is strictly verboten.
whatever Amps It’s gonna be uninterrupted snooker coverage for everyone! Good. Always breaks my concentration when I’m white-knuckling a four-hour afternoon session.
whatever Amps Lollers, no idea, it’s ‘too difficult’, clearly beyond the capabilities of man. Used to follow this guy on Twitter, and he’s doing a good series on YT about wealth inequality, including this about “who are the wealthy?”.
hugopal whatever Used to follow this guy on Twitter, and he’s doing a good series on YT about wealth inequality, including this about “who are the wealthy?”. Is this prat George Monbiot’s brother or something? Also, he should do his hair a favour and put it out of its misery.
