Amps
Think a large portion of that lands with the ECB to be fair

Just realised ‘Genocide in the Middle East’ should have been an option. Fairly sure Ed would still have edged it, but apologies for the oversight.

I’m going with Genocide in the Middle East, Amps. Or Jews turned Nazis. Either works.

  • Amps replied to this.

    rhouses Zionist governments or 1% psychopaths turned Nazis.

    Corrected that for you.

    Mad_Cyril in what way? It brings bigger, younger and mixed crowds and has doubled the salaries in the women’s game. If it only does that, it’s worked.

      Along_the_Wire apparently the food stalls are amazing too. Friend was saying it’s a real experience. I’d probably go for a game, but it’s still an abomination.

        I’m going with Ed if it’s neck and neck.

        Along_the_Wire
        I just find it bizarre to add another format in, and it’s a bizarre format.

        Makes the structure of the game incoherent in relation to the international game and, in particular, Test Cricket. From what I’ve seen crowds aren’t exactly huge.

        Could they not just have re-vamped T20.

          Mad_Cyril sells out the Oval and seen big crowds at other games on the TV. Good for the game overall, don’t care where it fits in to be honest

            Went to the semi finals of the Hundred a few years ago.

            £200 got me an unlimited bar and somewhat bizarrely, unlimited curry.

            Was absolutely fantastic.

            Cheers!

            • Amps replied to this.

              Smallman1 £200 got me an unlimited bar and somewhat bizarrely, unlimited curry.

              Where you probably did about £80 worth of beer and curry and went home.

              Good job Rhouses didn’t get a whiff of this. Would have taken the whole thing down