jonattonyeah He could drop GU009 Disc 3 and I still don’t think it would be worth paying for. For such a ‘forward looking, always looking for the next thing and not relying on classics’ guy, he’s awfully keen on relying on past work.

    12 days later

    Dan Can’t make out any of the lyrics. Sounds like intentional filler intended to build a rhythm but isn’t at all there. Utter shite.

      16 days later

      Can’t think of anywhere else to put this: <iframe src=“https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FGUMusic%2Fphotos%2Fa.296439085236%2F10165113466335237%2F%3Ftype%3D3&show_text=true&width=500” width=“500” height=“754” style=“border:none;overflow:hidden” scrolling=“no” frameborder=“0” allowfullscreen=“true” allow=“autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture; web-share”></iframe>

      Yeah but that doesnt give the story that is on the facebook page. All about the back story

      Iconic photo indeed but the doctored ones are far better.

        benson
        No worries. It would do the same if I posted the link.

          The little lighting guy over Sasha’s shoulder used to smoke huge blunts, you could stand in that little corner beside the box and get high off his smoke

          15 days later

          Anyone fancy sharing a full 2 hr of 071- the studio mix?

            benson totally agree…. the doctored one from A Night with Sasha was brilliant

              Wasily Any help with a few ID’s would be great. I’m partially deaf atm. 😅 😢

                  SM001 Spit some coffee when hearing him mention that among tracks featured.

                    SM001 Don’t thank him yet. There’s a Skrillex track on there. 😆

                    This sort of shit doesn’t even come as a surprise nowadays. He should just pack it in if this is the garbage he’s happy to churn out.

                      Smokemonk I’m a Select Subscriber. Bit of a lengthy process as far as how I provide my PW credentials to a scraping tool via terminal (if you care to know more the PMs are open). I’m surprised, can verify that my properties of the file is .M4A and (worse than your report of 64. . .) 63 KBPS.

                      EDIT: If you have a recommendation as to how to measure the Bit rate of the root file source (Mixcloud.com) . . . let me know. I’d assume that a subscriber should get better quality than 63 and am unsure if it is my program’s bottleneck.
                      Not the program that I use but here is an old thread explaining the errors that others have experienced [https://board.jdownloader.org/showthread.php?t=69109]