9/11 National Tragedy ?

vinnyt77

Maybe they practiced on MS Flight Sim? A lot??

Dan

Smallman1

Am I right in thinking it was 2 x planes into the WTC, 1 x plane into the Pentagon and 1 x plane that ended up in a field?

Or have I got my numbers wrong?

Smallman1

I used to ace Mario Kart at Uni.

To sum up, I’m a better driver than Lewis Hamilton.

jonattonyeah

Smallman1

Top, top game. Way better than 9-11.

Millsy

Completed it mate

LT42

Until you feel the wind beneath your wings you’ll never understand

Dan

I have this image of Bette Midler in my head.

LT42

Dan Ali just got a priority notification

Dan

LT42 Nailed on….with VIP

mono-stereo

LT42 a group containing 3400 architects and engineers have studied the WTC down to nano particles of dust. They all agree that the buildings did not come down due to the impact of planes and the melting of metal due to jet fuel combustion and that active thermitic material was found in abundance at the site. Are all these engineers and architects just conspiracy theorists and lying?

Which group are you talking about? Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9/11_Truth

Yup, I do think they are conspiracy theorists.

LT42

mono-stereo Really? What part of their study is a conspiracy theory? Explosive thermite was found at the WTC. The Commission refused to put that in the report. How would they explain to an angry public that explosive thermite was found in the ruins? It’s a bit provocative to deem genuine engineers and scientists from the Dept of Physics at Brigham Young, of all places, conspiracy theorists.

https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

mono-stereo

LT42 lets not forget a Boeing 757 can’t do what the plane tracked on radar did and that’s a fact that can’t be disputed.

What did the plane tracked on rader do that a Boeing 757 can’t do?

LT42

mono-stereo it dropped altitude from 7200ft down to ground level in 2 and a half minutes, including a 360 degree lateral loop at top speed. It can’t be done. Banking angles are locked at 30 degrees, anything over that and you’re losing control of the plane and it’s breaking apart at that speed and altitude. Even at 200kts it can’t be done. The plane isn’t designed for those stresses.

The 757 was introduced in the early 80s, modern jet fighters ın 2021 are designed for that kind of maneuverability.

Dubman

LT42

https://www.machinedesign.com/home/article/21830429/another-blow-for-wtc-conspiracy-theorists

mono-stereo

LT42 That report seems to be somewhat controversial and has been disputed since. The overwhelming consensus has favoured the official explanation.

mono-stereo

LT42 Where can read about this? Genuinely interested.

Mad_Cyril

Millsy
A LOL for Mimsy

Mad_Cyril

Along_the_Wire From memory, planes need to fly low to the ground to land.

Was thinking that this afternoon!!

alistair

Mad_Cyril lol

LT42

Dubman unable to read the report, Dubbers, looks like it’s gone. The New Mexicans for Science & Reason have stole the show with that name though. I can just imagine the LOLz if they were claiming the opposite.

Mad_Cyril

LT42
None required

LT42

Take a good long look at the size of a 757 then for the love of God look at the released footage at the Pentagon again.

Dan

LT42 If Ed was a plane… the neck on it! 🦒

« Previous Page Next Page »