IndustryStandard The point being, without the right to arms that rebellion would never have happened.
Kinda the other way around. The ‘right’ to bear arms was included in the US Constitution as part of the Bill of Rights in 1791, 8 years after the end of the American Revolutionary War. As it turns out, the only time the US population has actually needed to bear arms against the tyranny of government, it didn’t have the ‘right’ to do so - it just did it anyway. Go figure etc etc.
I’m not sure I believe the argument anyway - I think it’s a convenient excuse for gun ownership for a bunch of people that just like to own and shoot guns.
I think you’re right though - I can’t see a pathway to significant gun control in the US. I’m not sure how much of a difference it would really make at this point. There’s something ridiculous like 1.3 guns per adult member of the population in the US. No gun control advocate that I’ve seen in the past 30 years in the White House has had the political capital to do anything about it, and I don’t see that changing in my lifetime…