• General
  • Truss (general uk sucks thread)

alistair yep she followed Wendy Deng who allegedly had been having a tempestuous affair with Tony Blair

Interestingly, a lot of these birds like Wendy Deng, and Lucy Liu, who Westerners seem to fancy (maybe not you but Wendy Deng has snagged a few multi-millionaires and a toyboy), the Chinese consider bang average - actually pretty minging (particularly Lucy Liu with dark skin and slitty eyes, they actually consider her ‘peasant-looking’).

Their point being that an ambitious golddigger with Wendy Deng’s looks would have to go to the West as there’s not a chance in hell a Chinese multi-millionaire let alone billionaire would be interested in her.

They consider someone like Fan Bingbing the epitome of Asian beauty.

  • Amps replied to this.

    Is fanny bangbang a real person, dave?

      bosstrabs Wendy looks right up your street, skinny, and possibly had a stroke.

        Amps Wendy looks right up your street, skinny, and possibly had a stroke.

        You have to be joking, she’s chunky as fuck. She has the build of a (Japanese) inside centre.

        • Amps replied to this.

          bosstrabs Get her on the gear Dave, the weight’ll drop off her!

          Does Amps ever turn off the Twitter bilge pipe for five mins nowadays?

          • Amps replied to this.

            Millsy Think it was Doris Day who used to get young studio girls to blow it up her arse, feared ruining her looks etc. and liked young girls.

            Amps’ Raw Twitter Sewage © Hugo

            -si-
            He had a different Fanny Bangbang in every port

            Amps This just isn’t true anymore - it certainly was a couple of decades ago, but that power has gone. It’s about profit, not political influence any more, it’s about pandering to the readers’ needs and wants, not the whim of a press baron (what a ridiculously dated concept that is). It’s about circulation, click-bait and ad revenue.

            • Amps replied to this.

              Along_the_Wire I hear what you’re saying, they don’t have the same circulation anymore, and this some of their power has gone, but wasn’t it always about money? Be it with Murdochs other companies and holdings (oil, mining etc) or his papers and their circulation? Does one not go hand in hand with the other? Tell people what they want to hear, sell papers, in those same papers tell people lies that prop up his investments?

                Amps It was definitely true and NewsUK (Sun, Times and Talksport) is probably the last bastion of that, but really only to a very minor degree. NewsUK still loses a lot a money over the phone hacking scandal. Telegraph, Reach PLC (Mirror, Express, Star), DMG (Mail, Metro, The i) are about profit and selling copies and ads - all of them drive the agenda of their readers for fear or losing reach. You could argue that the previous regimes have shaped the readers opinion already, and there’s a fair bit of truth in that, but that’s where the influence stops.