Found Hugo.
Dispatches tonigh
- Edited
It does therefore need to be specified precisely what a person means when they try and label someone a “sex pest”.
I provided my interpretation, twice.
Imagine admiring Alex Jones or any of those twats tbf.
- Edited
mono-stereo I provided my interpretation, twice.
Yes and both times it was vague and at odds with how alistair used the term.
Here’s a simple way to highlight one of the issues: do you think being a “sex pest” also includes the kind of flirting alistair posted in his earlier video to illustrate what he meant? Yes or no. Because so far you haven’t indicated that you think it does.
hugopal 16 is legal
What about picking her up from school? Sex pest or just flirtatious?
- Edited
hugopal Let me try once more. I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine. I really can’t be any more clear then that.
We’re now arguing over semantics. Please try to control your autism and stop derailing this thread.
mono-stereo I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine.
This is totally unacceptable Mono, have a word with yourself
Wonder if Brand will get a stairwell noncebashing that leaves him quadra-spazzed on a lifeglug?
- Edited
bosstrabs We’re in a sex crisis.
Cankles-McJeggings What about picking her up from school? Sex pest or just flirtatious?
Maybe it was inconvenient by public transport?
- Edited
mono-stereo Let me try once more. I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine.
mono-stereo It was a simple point that everyone else seemed to get.
See, gotcha.
Clearly not “everyone else” got the supposedly “simple point” given that other people (not just me) interpreted it differently.
Cheers.