hugopal oh I forgot he’s renounced his past. It’s now come back to bite him on the arse.

      alistair seems like some of the anonymous accusers are also trying to renounce their past.

        It does therefore need to be specified precisely what a person means when they try and label someone a “sex pest”.

        I provided my interpretation, twice.

          mono-stereo I provided my interpretation, twice.

          Yes and both times it was vague and at odds with how alistair used the term.

          Here’s a simple way to highlight one of the issues: do you think being a “sex pest” also includes the kind of flirting alistair posted in his earlier video to illustrate what he meant? Yes or no. Because so far you haven’t indicated that you think it does.

              hugopal Let me try once more. I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine. I really can’t be any more clear then that.

              We’re now arguing over semantics. Please try to control your autism and stop derailing this thread.

                  mono-stereo I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine.

                  This is totally unacceptable Mono, have a word with yourself

                    Wonder if Brand will get a stairwell noncebashing that leaves him quadra-spazzed on a lifeglug?

                      Cankles-McJeggings What about picking her up from school? Sex pest or just flirtatious?

                      Maybe it was inconvenient by public transport?

                        mono-stereo Let me try once more. I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine.

                        mono-stereo It was a simple point that everyone else seemed to get.

                        See, gotcha.

                        Clearly not “everyone else” got the supposedly “simple point” given that other people (not just me) interpreted it differently.

                        Cheers.

                              After Brand’s denial, Channel 4 should have ran a totally different Dispatches and the Times left it for a week.

                              Also, why dig out the word ‘baroque’ to describe the allegations?

                              Makes you think, doesn’t it?

                              ``

                                ehitach2 Channel 4 should have ran a totally different Dispatches and the Times left it for a week.

                                Why?

                                ehitach2 Makes you think, doesn’t it?

                                Not even slightly.

                                    zackster
                                    Strong gesticulation game to be fair.

                                    Will try incorporate at work tomorrow.

                                    On video calls, working from home.

                                    WILL NOT be getting handsy in the office, at least not until Benson let’s us know if it’s OK or not?