mono-stereo I provided my interpretation, twice.

Yes and both times it was vague and at odds with how alistair used the term.

Here’s a simple way to highlight one of the issues: do you think being a “sex pest” also includes the kind of flirting alistair posted in his earlier video to illustrate what he meant? Yes or no. Because so far you haven’t indicated that you think it does.

      hugopal Let me try once more. I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine. I really can’t be any more clear then that.

      We’re now arguing over semantics. Please try to control your autism and stop derailing this thread.

          mono-stereo I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine.

          This is totally unacceptable Mono, have a word with yourself

            Wonder if Brand will get a stairwell noncebashing that leaves him quadra-spazzed on a lifeglug?

              Cankles-McJeggings What about picking her up from school? Sex pest or just flirtatious?

              Maybe it was inconvenient by public transport?

                mono-stereo Let me try once more. I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine.

                mono-stereo It was a simple point that everyone else seemed to get.

                See, gotcha.

                Clearly not “everyone else” got the supposedly “simple point” given that other people (not just me) interpreted it differently.

                Cheers.

                      After Brand’s denial, Channel 4 should have ran a totally different Dispatches and the Times left it for a week.

                      Also, why dig out the word ‘baroque’ to describe the allegations?

                      Makes you think, doesn’t it?

                      ``

                        ehitach2 Channel 4 should have ran a totally different Dispatches and the Times left it for a week.

                        Why?

                        ehitach2 Makes you think, doesn’t it?

                        Not even slightly.

                            zackster
                            Strong gesticulation game to be fair.

                            Will try incorporate at work tomorrow.

                            On video calls, working from home.

                            WILL NOT be getting handsy in the office, at least not until Benson let’s us know if it’s OK or not?

                                Mad_Cyril On video calls, working from home.

                                WILL NOT be getting handsy in the office, at least not until Benson let’s us know if it’s OK or not?

                                If you’re doing home office and touch up your missus does it count as workplace sexual harassment?

                                  Mad_Cyril cheers mate. For further HR advice please do not hesitate to contact me.

                                    hugopal Clearly not “everyone else” got the supposedly “simple point” given that other people (not just me) interpreted it differently.

                                    You’re literally the only person in this thread who can’t grasp the meaning of my orginal post, even though i explained it to you in basic terms, and now you’re conflating two separate arguments.

                                    I’ll ask you again, please stop derailing this thread by arguing about sematics.

                                    • Dan replied to this.