Dan Building up enough evidence as to form a watertight case.

Well the things seem that have happened over a decade ago and they still don’t seem to have much.

  • Dan replied to this.

      hugopal What’s the difference between someone who has sex with lots of people and a “sex pest”?

      Moral engineering.

      Direct response to the question, not a comment on the Russell Brand circus

          alistair he’s flirting and being funny, doesn’t seem like anyone is getting hurt.

          Or is flirting illegal now as well?

          And are you also gonna cancel Graham Norton for often making jokes based around innuendo on his show?

            hugopal CPS might have more if it does go to court. I’ll bet there’s loads more.

                Dan Yeah, the amount of people he’s had sex with must by in the thousands I would guess. You would expect many more to come out now if he’s a wrong cock.

                  mono-stereo Rape and sexual assault.

                  I don’t get your comment - are you saying it’s not possible to have sex with lots of people unless you’re committing sexual assault?

                      Mad_Cyril True, it’s also worth pointing out that going to the police often dosn’t end in justice for rape complainants.

                          hugopal I was commenting on two possible differences between a shagger and a (problematic) sex pest.

                              mono-stereo I was commenting on two possible differences between a shagger and a (problematic) sex pest.

                              That doesn’t really answer the question - neither of those examples define someone who is merely a shagger for instance.

                              Also, being flirty as Brand appears to be in the video alistair shared above is not committing sexual assault.

                              By your own comment you say you think Brand has probably got with women in the thousands - it hardly seems likely he’ll have done that by committing thousands of cases of assault. And when he’s getting with so many then why would he even need to commit assault? He comes across as flirty and provocative, but not violent.

                              How do you think someone should behave if they’re out with someone they want to invite back to theirs - say they’re currently struggling with a tax return and ask if they happen to be a chartered accountant?!

                                  mono-stereo
                                  Yep, same for DV.

                                  Not sure all the sensationalism helps though - that extract from the times was one step away from having stage directions.

                                  If all the energy burnt on sensationalism and internet ‘justice’ could be focussed on resolving the myriad issues in the Justice system, would be far more beneficial to the victims.

                                      hugopal How do you think someone should behave if they’re out with someone they want to invite back to theirs - say they’re currently struggling with a tax return and ask if they happen to be a chartered accountant?!

                                      Let me show you how incum tax works

                                          Old-Dutch careful now, that’s starting to sound too much like it could potentially be flirting - can’t be having that, it’s basically the same thing as assault don’t you know?!

                                            This is incredible:

                                            https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/16/accusations-russell-brand-tv-documentary-comic

                                            “…..the arrival on the cultural and current affairs landscape of popular internet pundits such as him and Tate, and in America, Joe Rogan and Ben Shapiro, has become a serious challenge to public faith in careful journalism and in the more experienced, educated voices of comment. And that is exactly what was intended."

                                            The absolute fucking state of that. Lol

                                              hugopal That doesn’t really answer the question - neither of those examples define someone who is merely a shagger for instance.

                                              It was a simple point that everyone else seemed to get. There is nothing wrong with consenual sex with lots of people “ie a shagger”. There is obviously somthing wrong if said shagger rapes and sexually assaults people, you might call them a sex pest. I’m not gonna repeat myself again so don’t bother asking me.

                                              hugopal He comes across as flirty and provocative, but not violent.

                                              Based on what? Has he fucked you? Was he a caring lover?