Homegrove Found Hugo.
I like Jordan Peterson, I don’t like Andrew Tate.
hugopal By not referring to genitalia for a start. He’s an overgrown child. It’s been about 20 years since I went on a first date but even know about basic etiquette.
alistair By not referring to genitalia for a start. He’s an overgrown child. It’s been about 20 years since I went on a first date but even know about basic etiquette.
Cancel the BBC, Graham Norton, David Tennant etc etc for not following what you call “basic etiquette” :
alistair He’s an overgrown child
He’s as of now been married for six years, and has two kids with a third on the way.
hugopal oh I forgot he’s renounced his past. It’s now come back to bite him on the arse.
alistair seems like some of the anonymous accusers are also trying to renounce their past.
It does therefore need to be specified precisely what a person means when they try and label someone a “sex pest”.
I provided my interpretation, twice.
mono-stereo I provided my interpretation, twice.
Yes and both times it was vague and at odds with how alistair used the term.
Here’s a simple way to highlight one of the issues: do you think being a “sex pest” also includes the kind of flirting alistair posted in his earlier video to illustrate what he meant? Yes or no. Because so far you haven’t indicated that you think it does.
Homegrove
Imagine admiring Alex Jones 😂 or any of those twats tbf.
hugopal Let me try once more. I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine. I really can’t be any more clear then that.
We’re now arguing over semantics. Please try to control your autism and stop derailing this thread.
hugopal 16 is legal
What about picking her up from school? Sex pest or just flirtatious?
Cankles-McJeggings What about picking her up from school? Sex pest or just flirtatious?
Maybe it was inconvenient by public transport?
mono-stereo I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine.
This is totally unacceptable Mono, have a word with yourself
mono-stereo Let me try once more. I gave my interpretation, not Alisairs. His interpretation of this or any other phrase may differ to mine.
mono-stereo It was a simple point that everyone else seemed to get.
See, gotcha.
Clearly not “everyone else” got the supposedly “simple point” given that other people (not just me) interpreted it differently.
Cheers.
Wonder if Brand will get a stairwell noncebashing that leaves him quadra-spazzed on a lifeglug?
bosstrabs We’re in a sex crisis.
hugopal Clearly not “everyone else” got the supposedly “simple point” given that other people (not just me) interpreted it differently.
You’re literally the only person in this thread who can’t grasp the meaning of my orginal post, even though i explained it to you in basic terms, and now you’re conflating two separate arguments.
I’ll ask you again, please stop derailing this thread by arguing about sematics.
After Brand’s denial, Channel 4 should have ran a totally different Dispatches and the Times left it for a week.
Also, why dig out the word ‘baroque’ to describe the allegations?
Makes you think, doesn’t it?
``
ehitach2 Channel 4 should have ran a totally different Dispatches and the Times left it for a week.
Why?
ehitach2 Makes you think, doesn’t it?
Not even slightly.
ehitach2 Big Parks & Wilson fan?
Mad_Cyril POWER PROG = the rapiest kind.
