I’ll answer your question now.
What is Fauci responsible for?
1) Personally approving NIAID (USA Taxpayer) funds into risky gain of function research into coronoviruses
2) After the Obama Administration called for an outright moratorium of gain of function research, facilitating the research to continue, offshore and in labs where the safety / security level of the environment is inadequate for the risk level of the research being performed
3) Creating a back channel approvals process to continue with risky gain of function experiments that bypasses the oversight of the USA’s regulatory authorities - the very committee assigned to assess the level of risk such research exposes the human population to before allowing the research to continue
4) Continuously lying, under oath, to Congress (see above post with Rand Paul) about his role in creating what became the worst pandemic in our lifetime / possibly in history)
5) Consprinig with oher medical professionals (who all knew full well from the outset) to misinform the public (in the Lancett - possibly the most highly trusted / cited medical journal) that the virus came from a natural evolution. This was the single most damaging act to destroy public faith and truly in ‘science’
6) Onwards - Outrightly banning all other medical professionals from appearing on TV in any capacity to talk about COVID or vaccines. Except for Bill Gates (I guess because he’s got no medical qualifications whatsoever that might exempt him from that rule)
I’ll leave his massively contradictory attitude to mask mandates and vaccines etc
for another time….
But don’t take my word for it. Here’s some details from Peter Daszak, the head of a company called the ‘Eco Health Alliance’ from 2016. Fauci was the funding Eco Health Alliance to perform gain of function research into coronoviruses in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK349040/
An interesting part of this article reads as follows:
Lack of Public Understanding of Threats
Investors are interested at the height of a crisis, Daszak said. He pointed out that the share value for Roche Holding, a Swiss global health care company, increased during the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Unfortunately, as discussed, the interest and hype are short lived and focused around the outbreak. Daszak shared a story of a publication in Nature describing SARS in China and work done with colleagues from China’s government-funded laboratory. The publication garnered no interest from the Chinese government, he said, and no one they talked with from the live animal markets seemed concerned about the findings. What was surprising for Daszak was how little interest was shown in the article from outside governments and the general public. Based on his experience and understanding, significant attention and interest should have come out of that article, but instead only a few virologists were interested in the paper for academic purposes—again showing the strong influence the media can have on public perception of threats.
Daszak also shared that during the recent Ebola outbreak, EcoHealth Alliance issued a press release and an analysis predicting which countries would be the first to be infected as a result of global air travel.2 The United States was predicted to be one of the top three countries that would receive infected individuals from countries with EVD, and it was predicted the patient would arrive into Dulles, Boston Logan, Newark, and/or JFK airport. They anticipated a lot of attention and coverage, but instead, again, there was very minimal pickup by the media. Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.
It’s almost like a playbook.
7) When an ‘independent commission’ is assembled by the WHO to assess the risk / impact / potential for the virus to have leaked from the lab in Wuhan - you know, the one doing the risky gain of function research by the EcoHealth Alliance, funded by the NIAID and signed off by Fauci. You’d think there would be someone who was, you know, independent.
Alas, Peter Daszak, owner of the Eco Heslth Alliance was assigned.
Eco Health Alliance are now banned from receiving any USAID funding.
The investigation into the cover up they were doing in conjunction with NIH employees and deleting of messages / deliberately misspellings words to circumvent FOIA requests etc. was pretty damning.
That’s just the start of it.
So please excuse me, if I find Fauci a complete and utter fraud and lying cunt.
His day is coming. And we should all want that
