OK - we can all agree that the subsequent strains of COVID have been less potent / virulent / deadly.
We all did what we were told we needed to do at the time.
I disagree strongly with the statement that the vaccines got us out of the pandemic quicker. I would agree that they got us out of lockdowns quicker - this was an arbitrary decision by collective governments.
A lot of people are happy with the information we were given at the time and argue that it’s the best we could do with the information we had at the time etc. “the science has changed since”. That’s cool - everyone is entitled to their opinion and views on this. Most people are far more forgiving than me on this one - that’s on me I guess.
My question to you is: if it transpires that a hell of a lot you were told at the time was lies - are you still OK with this because it got us out earlier? I guess so, but I’m not.
It seems nobody gives a fuck about the fact that the study to determine the actual safety and efficacy of this vaccine using actual samples and subjects, post vaccination has been completely burned. Not one person here has even acknowledged this from my original post - I’m all for debate and scientific based arguments. But why kill the study? Doesn’t this concern anyone?