• General
  • jeffrey epstein (didn't kill himself)

LT42 Also worth mentioning that Ronan Farrow has been sitting on the cover up scoop since 2015 but has been gagged by powerful sources.

Supposedly thats why the Netflix show was so wishy washy too. I thought it was going well enough, until the 4th episode which was a total joke. Supposedly they had to cut out a lot of shit, and recut huge portions. The way they suddenly made it about the strong empowered victims was a late stage scramble. Most all of that footage was from the CBS special that aired months ago.

Now that we’ve all seen it, I think I can state my major issues…

  1. WHERE THE FUCK IS GHISLANE?!?! I didn’t expect there to be a surprise arrest in the end, but they didn’t even take the time to put “Ghislane Maxwell has yet to be charged or arrested, and her whereabouts are unknown” in text on the screen. Nothing. Un-fucking- real.
  2. Not a single word about the temple. The majority of America had never even heard of Jeffrey Epstein until the temple images went viral. They have a fucking guy who says “I’ve been in every building on that island.” followed by overhead shots of the temple, and then nothing…. Like, at least have him say “sorry to disappoint but that building really is just a storage shed.”
  3. Same goes for Donald Barr hiring Epstein at Dalton or the fact that Donald Barr was connected to Robert Maxwell thru WWII intelligence work. That wasn’t worth a single sentence?
  4. And nothing was said about David Boies representing the victims in the last case. A close Clinton ally helps put a bow on the Epstein scandal, and we don’t even get a “David Boies of Clinton Impeachment fame…” So suspect.

The whole thing reeked of the old Nixon “limited hangout” tactic. Dear Andrew has clearly been cast adrift, but Bill and everyone else that we will probably never even know about are safe and sound.

I dunno where I read it (probably here tbh) but isn’t one of the producers of that Epstein show good mates with the Clintons so it’s a totally redacted version of events?

  • LT42 replied to this.

    Wally Not totally, they did show the flight logs with Clinton’s name on them. 27 times he went to the island and he completely denies ever being there. He prob doesn’t sweat either.

      LT42
      Didn’t that lady say that she didn’t see him doing anything dodgy.

      • LT42 replied to this.

        Dubman Gueffre? Yeah. To me that would suggest (given his status) that anything he was involved in was done in private. Not like Prince Andrew who had multiple photographs taken with him and his accusers, it seems Bill would’ve had a bit more tact. 27 visits and he says he was never there suggests he has something to hide. Like the workman at the island says, he could’ve just said yes I was there but it was always for business, tied in with Gueffre saying she never saw him doing anything, it would’ve exonerated him somewhat. There could well be girls out there who know much more.

        He’s defo been at it worh the rest of them. The lot of them should be fucking lynched to death.

        Bear in mind Clinton was in his late 40s when he started his affair with Lewinsky, she was 22 at the time. Same age as some of the women Epstein raped. Of course 22 is highly legal but it just points to the fact that young women weren’t an issue for these “old” men.

        More than a little jealousy swirling round this thread me thinks

        5 days later

        Aiight! That wasn’t bad. It’s been argued that her “submarine” experience was referring to the one Epstein built for Stephen Hawking.

        Also, I thought of something else they completely skipped over in the Netflix doc: the botched suicide/murder attempt. They never say Epstein was found unconscious in his cell, and that he told guards that his cell mate (murderer cop) tried to kill him. Nor do they say that guards found a cell phone in the cell mate’s possession.

          zackster that documentary just wasn’t what it could’ve been. useful for keeping the conversation going, but not much else. i’d love to believe that they couldn’t put certain details in because of active investigations, but we all know that’s not true.

          Yeah doesn’t seem likely, it could just be a move to try and detract from Anne Sacoolas.

            The prosecutors investigating Epstein’s crimes and his accessories don’t care about Anne Sacoolas. That’s just media conjecture.