Dispatches tonigh

Cankles-McJeggings

Back on the scag for Russ, he’s up to his neck in it. Sending cars to pick little girls up?

Old-Dutch

A storm in a b-cup

hugopal

gcw Whether any of it is true or not, his mainstream career is over.

Two things on this - firstly even the attitude of assuming that mere accusations will be enough to wreck a career is part of the problem; such a chain of thinking should not be normalised.

Second, Brand has spent recent years being very critical of mainstream media anyway, so such days were probably already in the past. I do wonder if this story was intended as a bit of revenge for that by some.

hugopal

Cankles-McJeggings 16 is legal.

zackster

hugopal 16 is legal.

Cankles-McJeggings

hugopal 16 is legal

What about picking her up from school? Sex pest or just flirtatious?

alistair

Brand has always been a sex pest and his behaviour has been indulged and excused by the mainstream media over many years. The question is why now?

Dan

alistair Building up enough evidence as to form a watertight case.

hugopal

alistair Brand has always been a sex pest

What’s the difference between someone who has sex with lots of people and a “sex pest”?

hugopal

Dan Building up enough evidence as to form a watertight case.

Well the things seem that have happened over a decade ago and they still don’t seem to have much.

alistair

hugopal the video in my “what a letch” post from yesterday. Pretty much every clip in it crosses the line don’t you think?

Mad_Cyril

hugopal What’s the difference between someone who has sex with lots of people and a “sex pest”?

Moral engineering.

Direct response to the question, not a comment on the Russell Brand circus

hugopal

alistair he’s flirting and being funny, doesn’t seem like anyone is getting hurt.

Or is flirting illegal now as well?

And are you also gonna cancel Graham Norton for often making jokes based around innuendo on his show?

Dan

hugopal CPS might have more if it does go to court. I’ll bet there’s loads more.

mono-stereo

Mad_Cyril What’s the difference between someone who has sex with lots of people and a “sex pest”?

Rape and sexual assault.

Mad_Cyril

mono-stereo Rape and sexual assault.

In a court of law, definitely. Which is where it should be sorted

hugopal

mono-stereo Rape and sexual assault.

I don’t get your comment - are you saying it’s not possible to have sex with lots of people unless you’re committing sexual assault?

mono-stereo

Dan Yeah, the amount of people he’s had sex with must by in the thousands I would guess. You would expect many more to come out now if he’s a wrong cock.

mono-stereo

Mad_Cyril True, it’s also worth pointing out that going to the police often dosn’t end in justice for rape complainants.

Old-Dutch

What’s better, being a right cock or a wrong cock?

bosstrabs

Old-Dutch

mono-stereo

hugopal I was commenting on two possible differences between a shagger and a (problematic) sex pest.

Dan

mono-stereo Conviction rate is really low.

Mad_Cyril

mono-stereo
Yep, same for DV.

Not sure all the sensationalism helps though - that extract from the times was one step away from having stage directions.

If all the energy burnt on sensationalism and internet ‘justice’ could be focussed on resolving the myriad issues in the Justice system, would be far more beneficial to the victims.

« Previous Page Next Page »