- Edited
Along_the_Wire Can you explain to me why this WAPO endorsement or lack thereof has created such a shit storm? I get the reasons why Bezos might support this ‘neutral’ stance (Trump odds on to win etc), but why is it so important to the readers that the paper takes a position? Is it the perception of external influence/control or spinelessness? I personally wouldn’t bat an eyelid if the NYT didn’t officially support Harris, even though the editorial board clearly do.