zackster further to my above post, from looking at the study referenced in the tweet, it was indeed created in relation to looking at the behaviour of employees, and not CEOs.
But even when you look beyond that, aspects of it seem rather bogus and counter-intuitive for what it’s trying to claim. For instance, one of its key findings was that “ those who state that rules should never be broken are 20% more likely to be terminated for toxic behavior” than those who think “sometimes it is necessary to break the rules to accomplish something”; yet one would guess that most people would be more likely to associate being more prone to following rules as less supposedly “toxic” than being prepared to break them.
