zackster Please accept this article in substitute.
The article still doesn’t help your case, in fact it does quite the reverse:
“ Neutralizing antibodies, the most important kind, as well as memory B cells and T cells seem to be relatively stable over at least 6 months, a preprint posted on 16 November shows, which “would likely prevent the vast majority of people from getting hospitalized disease, severe disease, for many years,” lead author Shane Crotty of the La Jolla Institute for Immunology told The New York Times.”
Furthermore:
“So far, no proof exists of mutations that would make the virus more pathogenic or that might help the virus evade immunity.”
The number of proven reinfections is very small anyway:
“the number of genetically proven reinfections is orders of magnitude lower than that of suspected reinfections. The Netherlands alone has 50 such cases, Brazil 95, Sweden 150, Mexico 285, and Qatar at least 243”
And in fact, being reinfected might not even be a big deal:
““I expect that most reinfections will be asymptomatic,” says Antonio Bertoletti, an infectious disease specialist at the National University of Singapore. He says being reinfected might even be a good thing”.
So yeah, thanks a lot for the article.
PS of course the pharmaceutical companies will be desperate to sell more of their product (in the form of booster jabs) to as many people as they can convince.
zackster And no need for ad hominem attacks.
Lastly, I think it’s relevant to the discussion when the person disagreeing with you demonstrates that they’re not even capable of reading the material they’ve used to form their viewpoint.
