LT42 Amps theory is correct. If Antifa or any other groups had any real balls then they would be attacking financial institutions etc and hurting the Koch Brothers (bad example actually).
And I simply pointed out that based on such a standard they’re therefore failing to reach it, e.g. in rioting and looting lots of local buildings and businesses that are too far removed from real centres of power to be noticeable and have much of an impact.
I illustrated this further by pointing out that similar happened in the London riots after the police shooting of Mark Duggan, when mobs of people literally ran through the City of London completely ignoring all the banks and skyscrapers to rather participate in mostly low-level vandalism against unrelated parties.
LT42
Your “hypothesis” was therefore redundant by trying to equate Amps’ fantasy with what’s happening in Minnesota. You’ve already claimed Blacks & Whites are treated the same based on data which doesn’t complete the overall picture of institutionalised racism. Unless, we’re just mouth breathers and can’t unpack what it is you’re trying to say, forgive me, please.
Firstly, I clearly didn’t “[claim] Blacks & Whites are treated the same based on data which doesn’t complete the overall picture of institutionalised racism” - I pointed out that “of course relative to population levels black people have a higher chance of being shot than white”. My post there was just a rebuttal of Along_The_Wire’s suggestion that white people are never victims of police brutality in the US. I was pointing out that, although black people are more likely to be killed by police in the US, it does also happen at a not insignificant rate to white people and hispanic people, i.e. being the victim of police brutality in the US is not a issue which is exclusive to any one race.
The rest of your post, bleurgh, what aspect of any of this is so incomprehensible or nonsensical?
