IndustryStandard Exactly, it was remarkable how the same knobs who were drinking alcopops (Hooperā€™s Hooch and Reef seemed to be the popular ones around here) in Mr. Smiths almost overnight were banging on about what a ā€˜choonā€™ Gouryella was (and other such pish at the saccharine-sweet end of trance).

    a month later

    Not very surprised by this. Daniel Wang has back pedalled quite drastically on his post about Gou.

      Lol, absolute tatters!

      Theyā€™ll be up in arms in BERKgain

        That kid looks like heā€™s been threatened.

        Iā€™ve dealt with people who were exactly as he described and heā€™ll have gone through a lot more than he lets on.

        I could be wrong but if I were a betting man Iā€™d say from the way he posted originally he was actually being truthful.

          NasserAlazzawi That kid looks like heā€™s been threatened.

          Iā€™ve dealt with people who were exactly as he described and heā€™ll have gone through a lot more than he lets on.

          Oh yeah for sure.

          Anybody whoā€™s spent significant amounts of time in East Asia knows how things work. It sparks a test of ā€˜guanxiā€™ (Iā€™ll make you know, somehow, that MY people are stronger than YOURS, even if it goes on behind the scenes, even if youā€™re right and Iā€™m wrong).

          I know sheā€™s Korean, but their culture is derived from Chinese

            Homegrove her lawyers blatantly got on the case. No joke.

            ā€œI fully retract everything I said and which I knew was untrueā€ - no one writes like that normally.

            New name: Peggy Sue.

                I hope he sent that via his SAMSUNG

                hugopal itā€™s not like what Wang originally posted wasnā€™t a slam dunk case of slander, which probably effected Gouā€™s future bookings.

                • Amps replied to this.

                    Homegrove Iā€™ve had too much coffee and canā€™t work through the double negative.

                        hugopal her lawyers blatantly got on the case. No joke.

                        What makes you think that? And under what circumstances?

                            LT42 youā€™re not one of her lawyers in disguise are you?!