Amps you could choose to stop angering them by encroaching on their land and treating them like prisoners in a concentration camp, you could agree to and act upon a road map to a two state solution, you could do all sorts to bring them back to the table and de-escalate the situation…

Very true. It’s no wonder they’re gunning for Israel.

I wonder how much there is we don’t know about why they kept encroaching like that.

hugopal Overall though, a surprisingly vaguely coherent contribution from Nas.

It was the coffee

      forzaforza is hugo the goy who lies down on the path in front of to club toilets in berlin and has Urolagnia fetish to piss on people?

      #makeufink.

      Are you high?

          NasserAlazzawi no joke, it’s true story, just ask anyone who has been to berlin. put me off ever going there again.

            C_J

            Obvious mis-spellings ✅
            Intentionally poor grammar ✅
            Someone other than me called it out ✅

            We’re at DEFCON 3 people

              Amps Netanyahu doesn’t want peace. He spent a decade supplying Hamas and Hezbullah with money and weapons. He condones land grabbing which is illegal under occupation laws under the Geneva Convention.

              He wants war,, he wants to exterminate all traces of Palestine, he’s a cunt

              • Amps replied to this.

                  Basically yeah, he doesn’t give a shite about the hostages, he never has – the longer they are held the better for him to keep running roughshod ( love that word ) over the poor bastards in Gaza. I just wish someone high in power would tell him to go fuck himself. Wont ever happen though

                  I’m inclined to agree about this being a long winded exercise to draw Iran out into the open so that the Yanks and the red sea pedestrians can finally implement regime change. Gaza is a testing ground for weapons as far as Netanyahu is concerned. See the bombing campaign of 2014 for further details and examples.

                    LT42 I’m inclined to agree about this being a long winded exercise to draw Iran out into the open so that the Yanks and the red sea pedestrians can finally implement regime change.

                    Fingers crossed!

                      "Israel’s response to Iran’s attacks on Israel will be “deadly, precise and surprising”, Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant has said."

                      Great

                        Hursty “Israel’s response to Iran’s attacks on Israel will be “deadly, precise and surprising”, Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant has said.”

                        Dropping heavy ordnance on some Iranian General whilst he’s having a sneaky hot dog would fit this description

                          LT42 I hear you, but that is a risky and complicated plot. I’m not sure the post 9.11 / Dessert Storm / Afgan debacle US public want much direct involvement in the middle east anymore. Way more likely to be a simple pay day for the weapons companies with a bonus land grab for the Zionists… no?

                          • LT42 replied to this.

                              Amps I’m not sure the post 9.11 / Dessert Storm / Afgan debacle US public want much direct involvement in the middle east anymore.

                              I don’t think public opinion matters anymore, do you?

                                  LT42 Hmmmmm… as the US isn’t quite a full dictatorship yet, and their elections seem to be genuine, I’m gonna say, yes, it does matter. But I reserve the right to change my mind on this one. Depends on the size of my current tinfoil hat.

                                      Amps I don’t think the Israeli or Yank Govts give 2 fucks about what people think or what the public opinion is in general. There’s more than enough evidence to suggest so, despite them having quasi-democratic elections.

                                        LT42

                                        Amps

                                        One of the key things in matters such as this though, is for various strategic and PR related reasons a government is simply not able to be open and transparent with the public as to the what and why of their exact involvement in certain wars.

                                        If the benefits of such an involvement were to be clearly explained (eg cost-benefit calculation of access to resources, destabilisation of a hostile regime etc.) then voters would be better informed and perhaps more would subsequently support the decisions more - but it would also clearly inform their enemies as to their plans and generate further animosity and backlash from those hostile to them.

                                        You might claim this to be “undemocratic” but it’s unavoidable - countries will have classified information which requires being kept from the public.