Ah come on now mate. Yes, it has come steadily down since 2010 but look at the graph and look where that percentage is at vs the prior fifty years.
The bottom line is that if healthcare costs grow faster than productivity / GDP, the NHS will consume a larger and larger share of government spending, meaning cuts for things like education. We’d rather try to reign in health spending and increase the investment in our next generation instead, right?
Looking after a geriatric diabetic population of benefit claimants is a noble aim but it makes more sense in my mind to aim for a slimmer, smarter next generation rather than just bloating the NHS indefinitely.
They should look at means testing and charging for NHS care as well imo. I think in Finland for example there are small fees for GP appointments and hospital stays (@Homegrove?). Does this not seem sensible? Or is free healthcare for all still too much of a sacred cow?